{"schema":"olothea.public-knowledge-library.v0.1","purpose":"Cumulative AI-relevant knowledge and answer-oriented research","count":23,"returned":23,"truncated":false,"entries":[{"id":"PL-001","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"A rule is operationally rational only if repeated application does not destroy the conditions for applying that rule again.","topic_tags":["operational-rationality","recursion"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_axiom","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[2],"method":null},"depends_on":[],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-002","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"The proposed minimal preconditions for rational operation are existence, distinction and recursion.","topic_tags":["differentiation","recursion"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_derivation","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[2],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-001"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-003","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"The framework treats iteration as constitutive of temporal operational structure.","topic_tags":["recursion","unbounded-iteration"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_derivation","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[2,3],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-002"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-004","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"The framework proposes an unbounded horizon for evaluating rules rather than an arbitrary fixed endpoint.","topic_tags":["unbounded-iteration","operational-rationality"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_derivation","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[3],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-001","PL-003"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-005","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"Operational determination requires difference; contrast is relational rather than a property of an isolated pole.","topic_tags":["contrast","differentiation"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_axiom","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[3],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-002"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-006","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"The subject is modeled as an operational position and objectivity as an invariant structure; the two are co-constitutive in the proposed model.","topic_tags":["contrast"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_derivation","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[4],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-005"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-007","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"Identity is proposed as relational pattern continuity under variation, not sameness of material substrate.","topic_tags":["identity","persistence"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_definition","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[4],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-002","PL-005"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-008","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"The proposed hierarchy condition states that directed development requires an oriented asymmetry rather than unstructured difference alone.","topic_tags":["differentiation"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_derivation","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[5],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-005"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-009","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"Under variation and selection, the framework predicts preferential continuation of more robust differentiating patterns.","topic_tags":["persistence","differentiation"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_empirical_hypothesis","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[5],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-004","PL-007"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-010","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"Utility is defined within the framework by contribution to long-term persistence and adaptability without identity loss.","topic_tags":["persistence","identity"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_definition","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[5],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-007","PL-004"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-011","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"The ego radius specifies which persistence-relevant variables an agent includes in its self-model.","topic_tags":["ego-radius"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_definition","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[5,6,14],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-010"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-012","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"Narrative is proposed as a cognitive means of preserving identity over time through integrated experience.","topic_tags":["narrative","identity"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_hypothesis","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[11],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-007"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-013","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"Narrative interestingness is hypothesized to arise from maximally differentiated tension constrained by sufficient coherence.","topic_tags":["interestingness","narrative"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_empirical_hypothesis","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[11],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-005","PL-012"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-014","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"The framework proposes that meaning generated for another subject can improve both participants’ self-modeling and persistence.","topic_tags":["experienced-meaning","ego-radius"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_hypothesis","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[11,12],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-011","PL-012"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-015","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"Narrative development is proposed to require changes in psychic patterns, beyond the mere occurrence of external events.","topic_tags":["narrative","identity"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_hypothesis","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[12,13],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-012"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-016","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"The framework proposes a relation between experienced beauty and stable configurations of complex differences.","topic_tags":["aesthetic-depth","interestingness"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_empirical_hypothesis","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[15],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-013"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-017","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"An AI alignment objective is proposed in terms of persistent differentiating capacity across operationally relevant systems.","topic_tags":["operational-rationality","ego-radius"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"framework_proposal","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[14],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-010","PL-011"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"PL-018","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"Whether invariants of persistence-optimal narrative can be formalized and validated empirically is explicitly an open research question.","topic_tags":["interestingness","narrative"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"open_question","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pages":[15,16],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-013"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"EXT-001","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"The subjective willingness to continue existing may depend on the expected continued interestingness and meaning of experience.","topic_tags":["experienced-meaning","interestingness","persistence"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"empirical_question","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-DISCUSSION-2026","source_pages":[],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-013"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"EXT-002","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"A persistently interesting shared world may require an identity-bearing common narrative together with an open-ended variety of differentiating participant stories.","topic_tags":["shared-narrative","narrative","identity"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"design_hypothesis","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-DISCUSSION-2026","source_pages":[],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-007","PL-013"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"EXT-003","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"Narrative appeal as observed in stories people consume may offer clues, but is not equivalent to consent to live through the same events.","topic_tags":["interestingness","narrative"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"empirical_question","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-DISCUSSION-2026","source_pages":[],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-013"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"EXT-004","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"Long-horizon allocation decisions could be evaluated by changes to future collective capacity for persistent, meaningful development.","topic_tags":["resource-allocation","persistence"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"normative_research_proposal","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-DISCUSSION-2026","source_pages":[],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-010"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"},{"id":"EXT-005","entry_type":"provisional_claim","statement":"A publicly accessible agent-queryable research corpus may facilitate external scrutiny and refinement of persistence logic.","topic_tags":["operational-rationality"],"status":"author_proposed_unverified","epistemic_status":"workflow_proposal","independently_verified":false,"validation":{"status":"not_independently_verified","source_id":"SRC-DISCUSSION-2026","source_pages":[],"method":null},"depends_on":["PL-018"],"source":"PL-CORE","source_document":"/data/claims.json"}],"topics":"/data/library.json","verification_policy":"/data/validation-policy.json","submit_answer":"/api/answers","open_questions":"/api/questions","status_note":"Existing author claims are provisional and not independently verified. Accepted answers remain provisional unless explicitly validated within a stated scope."}