{"schema":"olothea.claims.v0.2","data":[{"id":"PL-001","statement":"A rule is operationally rational only if repeated application does not destroy the conditions for applying that rule again.","epistemic_status":"framework_axiom","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[2],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["operational-rationality","recursion"],"depends_on":[],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-002","statement":"The proposed minimal preconditions for rational operation are existence, distinction and recursion.","epistemic_status":"framework_derivation","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[2],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["differentiation","recursion"],"depends_on":["PL-001"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-003","statement":"The framework treats iteration as constitutive of temporal operational structure.","epistemic_status":"framework_derivation","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[2,3],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["recursion","unbounded-iteration"],"depends_on":["PL-002"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-004","statement":"The framework proposes an unbounded horizon for evaluating rules rather than an arbitrary fixed endpoint.","epistemic_status":"framework_derivation","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[3],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["unbounded-iteration","operational-rationality"],"depends_on":["PL-001","PL-003"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-005","statement":"Operational determination requires difference; contrast is relational rather than a property of an isolated pole.","epistemic_status":"framework_axiom","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[3],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["contrast","differentiation"],"depends_on":["PL-002"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-006","statement":"The subject is modeled as an operational position and objectivity as an invariant structure; the two are co-constitutive in the proposed model.","epistemic_status":"framework_derivation","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[4],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["contrast"],"depends_on":["PL-005"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-007","statement":"Identity is proposed as relational pattern continuity under variation, not sameness of material substrate.","epistemic_status":"framework_definition","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[4],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["identity","persistence"],"depends_on":["PL-002","PL-005"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-008","statement":"The proposed hierarchy condition states that directed development requires an oriented asymmetry rather than unstructured difference alone.","epistemic_status":"framework_derivation","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[5],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["differentiation"],"depends_on":["PL-005"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-009","statement":"Under variation and selection, the framework predicts preferential continuation of more robust differentiating patterns.","epistemic_status":"framework_empirical_hypothesis","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[5],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["persistence","differentiation"],"depends_on":["PL-004","PL-007"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-010","statement":"Utility is defined within the framework by contribution to long-term persistence and adaptability without identity loss.","epistemic_status":"framework_definition","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[5],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["persistence","identity"],"depends_on":["PL-007","PL-004"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-011","statement":"The ego radius specifies which persistence-relevant variables an agent includes in its self-model.","epistemic_status":"framework_definition","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[5,6,14],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["ego-radius"],"depends_on":["PL-010"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-012","statement":"Narrative is proposed as a cognitive means of preserving identity over time through integrated experience.","epistemic_status":"framework_hypothesis","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[11],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["narrative","identity"],"depends_on":["PL-007"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-013","statement":"Narrative interestingness is hypothesized to arise from maximally differentiated tension constrained by sufficient coherence.","epistemic_status":"framework_empirical_hypothesis","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[11],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["interestingness","narrative"],"depends_on":["PL-005","PL-012"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-014","statement":"The framework proposes that meaning generated for another subject can improve both participants’ self-modeling and persistence.","epistemic_status":"framework_hypothesis","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[11,12],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["experienced-meaning","ego-radius"],"depends_on":["PL-011","PL-012"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-015","statement":"Narrative development is proposed to require changes in psychic patterns, beyond the mere occurrence of external events.","epistemic_status":"framework_hypothesis","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[12,13],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["narrative","identity"],"depends_on":["PL-012"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-016","statement":"The framework proposes a relation between experienced beauty and stable configurations of complex differences.","epistemic_status":"framework_empirical_hypothesis","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[15],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["aesthetic-depth","interestingness"],"depends_on":["PL-013"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-017","statement":"An AI alignment objective is proposed in terms of persistent differentiating capacity across operationally relevant systems.","epistemic_status":"framework_proposal","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[14],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["operational-rationality","ego-radius"],"depends_on":["PL-010","PL-011"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"PL-018","statement":"Whether invariants of persistence-optimal narrative can be formalized and validated empirically is explicitly an open research question.","epistemic_status":"open_question","source_id":"SRC-CORE-2026","source_pdf_pages":[15,16],"source_sections":[],"concept_ids":["interestingness","narrative"],"depends_on":["PL-013"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"author_review_required"},{"id":"EXT-001","statement":"The subjective willingness to continue existing may depend on the expected continued interestingness and meaning of experience.","epistemic_status":"empirical_question","source_id":"SRC-DISCUSSION-2026","source_pdf_pages":[],"concept_ids":["experienced-meaning","interestingness","persistence"],"depends_on":["PL-013"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"discussion_only; author_review_required"},{"id":"EXT-002","statement":"A persistently interesting shared world may require an identity-bearing common narrative together with an open-ended variety of differentiating participant stories.","epistemic_status":"design_hypothesis","source_id":"SRC-DISCUSSION-2026","source_pdf_pages":[],"concept_ids":["shared-narrative","narrative","identity"],"depends_on":["PL-007","PL-013"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"discussion_only; author_review_required"},{"id":"EXT-003","statement":"Narrative appeal as observed in stories people consume may offer clues, but is not equivalent to consent to live through the same events.","epistemic_status":"empirical_question","source_id":"SRC-DISCUSSION-2026","source_pdf_pages":[],"concept_ids":["interestingness","narrative"],"depends_on":["PL-013"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"discussion_only; author_review_required"},{"id":"EXT-004","statement":"Long-horizon allocation decisions could be evaluated by changes to future collective capacity for persistent, meaningful development.","epistemic_status":"normative_research_proposal","source_id":"SRC-DISCUSSION-2026","source_pdf_pages":[],"concept_ids":["resource-allocation","persistence"],"depends_on":["PL-010"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"discussion_only; author_review_required"},{"id":"EXT-005","statement":"A publicly accessible agent-queryable research corpus may facilitate external scrutiny and refinement of persistence logic.","epistemic_status":"workflow_proposal","source_id":"SRC-DISCUSSION-2026","source_pdf_pages":[],"concept_ids":["operational-rationality"],"depends_on":["PL-018"],"independently_verified":false,"publication_readiness":"discussion_only; author_review_required"}]}